Only 3% Get Verified – What’s Going On?

verified yes

Forced website age verification sparks fierce debate over free speech and privacy rights, pitting child protection against constitutional freedoms.

At a Glance

  • Age verification laws aim to protect minors online but face First Amendment challenges
  • Only 3% of users complete age verification due to privacy concerns
  • Utah’s Social Media Regulation Act requires parental consent for users under 18
  • Critics argue these laws chill adult speech and compromise user privacy
  • Debate centers on balancing child safety with constitutional rights

Age Verification: A Constitutional Minefield

The push for online age verification has ignited a firestorm of controversy, pitting child safety advocates against defenders of constitutional freedoms. As states rush to implement laws requiring websites to verify users’ ages, particularly for adult content, the clash between protecting minors and preserving First Amendment rights has reached a critical juncture.

TechFreedom, a nonprofit technology policy think tank, has joined an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a Fifth Circuit decision on Texas House Bill 1181. This bill, which mandates age verification for websites with adult content, has been criticized for threatening online anonymity and infringing on free speech rights.

The Chilling Effect on Free Speech

Critics argue that age verification requirements create a significant barrier to accessing constitutionally protected speech. The statistics are alarming: only 3% of visitors complete age verification successfully, demonstrating the chilling effect these measures have on adult access to legal content.

“The district court rightly found that HB 1181 unconstitutionally restricts adult access to protected speech,” said Santana Boulton, Legal Fellow at TechFreedom. “Adult speech is generally protected by the First Amendment. Yet age-verification technology deters users from visiting adult sites because those users are worried about their privacy. One site says only 3% of visitors complete age-verification successfully.”

This staggering statistic underscores the real-world impact of these laws on free expression and access to information. It’s a clear indication that well-intentioned efforts to protect children online are having unintended consequences that threaten the very fabric of our constitutional rights.

Privacy Concerns and Technological Shortcomings

The implementation of age verification technologies raises serious privacy concerns. ID verification and facial scanning methods are not foolproof, and the risk of data breaches looms large. Many adults are understandably hesitant to hand over sensitive personal information to verify their age, especially when accessing legal adult content.

“ID verification and facial scanning technology aren’t foolproof, nor are they perfectly secure,” Boulton continued. “Some adults don’t have the required government ID or data trail, and others don’t want to hand over these sensitive documents to age-verification providers. People take their online anonymity very seriously, especially when it comes to adult content. Despite improvements in securing the data used to verify age, requiring users to age-verify themselves chills protected speech because users continue to fear a loss of anonymity of pseudonymity.”

This erosion of privacy and anonymity strikes at the heart of internet freedom, potentially creating a digital landscape where every click and interaction is monitored and verified. It’s a slippery slope that could lead to a chilling effect on free expression and open discourse online.

The Utah Model: A New Battleground

Utah’s Social Media Regulation Act, which became law in March, has set a precedent that other states are eager to follow. The law requires social media companies to verify the age of Utah residents and obtain parental consent for users under 18. While proponents argue this gives parents more control over their children’s online interactions, critics see it as an overreach that could have far-reaching consequences for all internet users.

The law’s provisions, which include limiting minors’ access hours to social media and prohibiting strangers from direct messaging minors, are framed as regulating contract formation rather than speech. This clever legal maneuver attempts to sidestep direct First Amendment challenges, but it still raises significant concerns about government overreach and the potential for abuse.

The Road Ahead: Balancing Safety and Liberty

As the debate rages on, it’s clear that finding a balance between protecting children online and preserving constitutional freedoms will be no easy task. The Supreme Court’s decision on the Texas law could set a crucial precedent for how we approach internet regulation in the age of social media.

“Content-based regulations of speech are presumptively invalid under strict scrutiny,” Boulton concluded. “The Fifth Circuit broke with precedent and applied a lower form of scrutiny to uphold the law. We urge the Supreme Court to apply long-standing First Amendment law and protect Americans’ freedom of speech, including their freedom to access adult content.”

As concerned citizens, we must remain vigilant against well-intentioned laws that could erode our fundamental rights. The push for online age verification, while aimed at protecting children, threatens to create a digital landscape where privacy is a luxury and free speech is constrained by technological barriers. It’s a reminder that in the digital age, the battle to preserve our constitutional freedoms is far from over.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR