Danger Lurks – A Silent War on Conservatives

Republican and Democratic flags on USA map background.

Chairman Clay Higgins steps up to investigate the disturbing surge in politically motivated “swatting” attacks targeting conservatives, demanding answers from the FBI and Department of Justice about their failure to protect American citizens from this dangerous form of intimidation.

Key Takeaways

  • Representative Clay Higgins has launched a formal investigation into the alarming increase of politically motivated “swatting” attacks targeting conservatives across the country.
  • The Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement has requested a staff-level briefing from Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel by April 9, 2025.
  • Swatting, which involves falsely reporting emergencies to trigger armed police responses at victims’ homes, puts both targets and law enforcement at serious risk.
  • The investigation aims to determine what measures are being taken to hold perpetrators accountable and protect citizens from politically motivated harassment.

Rising Threat to Conservative Americans

In a decisive move to address a growing form of political intimidation, Representative Clay Higgins (R-La.), Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement, has initiated a formal investigation into the disturbing trend of “swatting” incidents targeting conservatives. Swatting, a dangerous form of criminal deception, involves making false emergency reports to law enforcement that trigger heavily armed responses to innocent victims’ homes. The tactic has increasingly been weaponized against Americans based solely on their political beliefs, creating a climate of fear and putting both victims and responding officers in potentially deadly situations.

The investigation comes amid growing concerns that politically motivated swatting incidents are being used as a form of terrorism against conservative voices, with numerous high-profile incidents reported across the country. When perpetrators make these false emergency calls, they typically describe scenarios involving imminent danger or violent crime, prompting tactical teams to respond with weapons drawn – creating terrifying and potentially deadly encounters for unsuspecting victims who have done nothing more than express their political views publicly.

Demanding Accountability from Federal Agencies

Chairman Higgins has formally requested information from both the Department of Justice and the FBI regarding their efforts to investigate these politically targeted attacks and hold those responsible accountable. In a letter addressed to Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, Higgins made clear that the subcommittee expects a thorough accounting of current enforcement measures. The letter demands a staff-level briefing by April 9, 2025, underscoring the urgency with which Congress views this emerging threat to political expression and personal safety.

“The Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement (Subcommittee) is investigating the recent increase in “swatting” incidents which appear to be targeting individuals based on their political affiliation. The Subcommittee requests information from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on the steps being taken to thoroughly investigate these incidents of political violence and hold those responsible accountable. To assist the Subcommittee with its investigation, I am requesting a staff-level briefing from the DOJ and FBI by April 9, 2025, to understand what is being done to investigate and hold accountable those responsible for politically motivated swatting incidents,” – Subcommittee Chairman Clay Higgins

The investigation represents a significant step toward addressing what many conservative Americans see as a form of political persecution enabled by lax enforcement and inadequate prioritization by federal law enforcement. Critics have long maintained that politically motivated attacks against conservatives receive less attention and resources from federal agencies than similar threats against those on the left, creating a two-tiered justice system that emboldens perpetrators to continue their dangerous harassment campaigns.

The Real-World Dangers of Swatting

Swatting represents far more than a mere prank or nuisance – it creates potentially life-threatening situations for victims and responding officers alike. When heavily armed police units respond to what they believe is a serious violent crime in progress, the risk of tragic misunderstandings or accidental shootings increases dramatically. Several incidents across the country have already resulted in serious injuries and even deaths when innocent people were confronted by tactical teams responding to false reports. Beyond the immediate physical danger, swatting incidents impose significant financial costs on local law enforcement agencies and traumatize victims who find themselves suddenly facing armed officers at their doorsteps.

The fear created by these attacks serves as a form of political intimidation, potentially silencing conservative voices who worry that their public statements might make them targets. This chilling effect on free speech represents a serious threat to democratic discourse and undermines Americans’ fundamental right to express their political views without fear of harassment or violence. By targeting citizens based on their political beliefs, perpetrators of swatting attacks are engaging in a form of domestic terrorism that the federal government has so far failed to adequately address.

A Critical Step Toward Protecting American Citizens

Chairman Higgins’ investigation signals a welcome shift toward holding accountable those who would weaponize emergency services to terrorize political opponents. For many conservative Americans who have felt increasingly targeted for their beliefs, this inquiry represents a critical acknowledgment of the serious nature of politically motivated swatting and a necessary step toward ensuring their safety and security. The investigation will likely examine whether current laws are sufficient to address these attacks and whether federal agencies have provided adequate resources and prioritization to investigating and prosecuting perpetrators.

As the April 9 deadline approaches, the responses from Attorney General Bondi and FBI Director Patel will provide important insights into the federal government’s current approach to politically motivated swatting incidents and potentially lay the groundwork for stronger protections for all Americans, regardless of political affiliation. For conservative citizens concerned about the increasingly hostile political climate, Chairman Higgins’ investigation offers hope that their government is finally taking seriously the threats they face simply for expressing their constitutional rights to free speech and political expression.