Bill Gates-backed group’s opposition to RFK Jr.’s HHS nomination exposed as astroturfing with fake signatories.
Key Takeaways
- The “Committee to Protect Health Care” opposing RFK Jr.’s nomination is described as an astroturf organization backed by Bill Gates.
- The committee’s open letter criticizing Trump’s decision to appoint Kennedy allows fake names to be added as signatories.
- The organization’s funding is linked to left-leaning entities and major donors like Bill Gates, George Soros, and Mark Zuckerberg.
- The committee’s structure as a 501(c)4 allows it to withhold the identities of its financial backers.
- This revelation raises questions about the authenticity of grassroots opposition to Kennedy’s nomination.
Unmasking the “Grassroots” Opposition
In a startling revelation, the seemingly grassroots opposition to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination as Secretary of Health and Human Services has been exposed as a carefully orchestrated astroturfing campaign. The “Committee to Protect Health Care,” which published an open letter criticizing Donald Trump’s decision to appoint Kennedy, has been unmasked as a Bill Gates-backed entity that accepts fictitious endorsements.
The committee claims to have thousands of signatories on its open letter, but a closer investigation reveals a troubling lack of verification process. Breitbart News and other sources have demonstrated the ability to add fake names to the signatory list, calling into question the legitimacy of the entire opposition movement.
Following the Money Trail
The Committee to Protect Health Care’s structure as a 501(c)4 organization allows it to operate without disclosing its donors, raising suspicions about its true backers. However, a related 501(c)3 charity, The Committee to Protect Health Care Fund, provides some insight into the funding streams. This affiliate is funded by the Sixteen Thirty Fund and Hopewell Fund, both of which are managed by Arabella Advisors, an expert philanthropy consultancy.
According to reports from the Capital Research Center, Arabella Advisors is supported by high-profile donors such as Bill Gates, George Soros, and Mark Zuckerberg. These influential figures use their donations to navigate policy discussions favorable to their interests, potentially including opposition to Kennedy’s nomination.
The Implications of Astroturfing
The term “astroturfing” suggests that the committee’s list of opposing doctors is unreliable and artificially created to give the appearance of widespread grassroots opposition. This revelation casts doubt on the authenticity of the movement against Kennedy’s nomination and raises questions about the true motivations behind the campaign.
Joel B. Pollak, Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News, reported on the issue of fake signatories, further exposing the questionable tactics employed by the committee. This investigative work has brought to light the deceptive nature of the opposition, potentially swaying public opinion on the validity of the concerns raised against Kennedy.
The Bigger Picture: Dark Money and Political Influence
The exposure of this astroturfing campaign highlights a broader issue of dark money influencing political processes. The intricate web of funding involving major philanthropists and left-leaning entities raises concerns about the integrity of public discourse and the true nature of opposition to political appointments.
As citizens, it is crucial to remain vigilant and question the authenticity of seemingly grassroots movements, especially when they involve high-stakes political decisions. The RFK Jr. nomination controversy serves as a stark reminder of the complex and often hidden forces at play in shaping public opinion and policy.
