In a provocative move, Georgia Congressman Barry Loudermilk is spearheading an effort to challenge the findings of the January 6th Committee, alleging crucial evidence was overlooked.
At a Glance
- The Committee on House Administration’s Subcommittee, led by Loudermilk, demands correction of the DoD’s January 6 report.
- The DoD reportedly delayed National Guard deployment on January 6.
- Political optics allegedly influenced DoD officials’ decisions during the Capitol riot.
- Loudermilk plans to invalidate the Democrat-led January 6th Committee’s findings.
Loudermilk’s Investigation Unveils New Allegations
Barry Loudermilk, Chairman of the Committee on House Administration’s Subcommittee on Oversight, demands a correction to the Department of Defense’s January 6 report due to its alleged inaccuracies. His team insists that the DoD Inspector General’s report was incomplete, favoring the Department of Defense and U.S. Army while unfairly disadvantaging the D.C. National Guard. Testimonies and records show the National Guard’s response was delayed by senior DoD officials during the Capitol riot, a pivotal event influencing national security.
The investigation uncovered staggering delays in deploying the National Guard, exacerbated by Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy’s misleading statements to Congress. Videos and testimonies suggest that political optics played a significant role in these delays, resulting in the Guard remaining in the Armory until late in the day while chaos unfolded.
The former J6 Committee is not above accountability or immune from transparency for promoting false political narratives instead of conducting a genuine investigation.
I will continue to pursue the truth, and hold them and others accountable. @JudicialWatch https://t.co/6sjQTYpDYv
— Rep. Barry Loudermilk (@RepLoudermilk) November 20, 2024
Efforts to Correct the Narrative
Loudermilk’s Subcommittee has formally rejected the DoD Inspector General’s report. They highlighted how key D.C. National Guard personnel, whose testimonies undermined senior DoD officials’ actions, were omitted from the published report. This omission prompts calls for transparency and accountability. The Subcommittee aims to rectify the report’s misrepresentations, with Loudermilk planning a congressional resolution to invalidate the original findings, based on his investigation’s evidence.
“My Subcommittee worked with the DoD IG in good faith throughout our investigation to provide multiple opportunities for the DOD IG to produce corroborating materials or evidence to support their conclusions,” said Chairman Loudermilk.
The GOP congressman’s efforts signal a broader ambition to challenge Democratic narratives surrounding the January 6th events. Loudermilk contends that the DoD report failed to scrutinize critical details involving senior officials, rendering its findings unreliable and skewed.
Pushing for Resolution and Accountability
As Congress reconvenes, Loudermilk’s proposed resolution to discredit the January 6th Committee’s findings is poised to spark substantial debate. He argues that his investigative efforts bring enough new evidence to necessitate this overturning, a move representing an acute reflection on divided views amongst lawmakers.
“Georgia GOP Congressman Barry Loudermilk says he’s aiming for a resolution in the new Congress to make the Democrat January 6th Committee findings invalid based on evidence he’s uncovered in his investigation,” said John Hines.
The political fracturing over these revelations is illustrative of increasing partisan debates over key national events. As the nation watches, these developments in Congress could redefine the political landscape, challenging previous narrative conformity and underscoring enduring divisions.
